Creationism radiocarbon dating
However, none of the criticisms of young earth creationists have any scientific merit.Radiometric dating remains a reliable scientific method.Click below to review previous ICR research initiatives.The topic of radiometric dating has received some of the most vicious attacks by young earth creation science theorists.While differences in biblical interpretation or in calculation methodology can produce some differences in the creation date, most results fall relatively close to one of these two dominant models.The primary reason for the disparity seems to lie in which underlying Biblical text is chosen (roughly 5500 BC based on the Greek Septuagint text, about 3750 BC based on the Hebrew Masoretic text).The net difference between the two major genealogies of Genesis is 1466 years (ignoring the "second year after the flood" ambiguity), 85% of the total difference.
Why not say that it is reckoned from the Exodus from Egypt, omitting the first thousand years and giving the years of the next thousand? Said Rav Nahman: In the Diaspora the Greek Era alone is used.The institute’s mission has been to advance quality research that impacts our understanding of the creation model as described in Genesis. Henry Morris in 1970, ICR scientists have endeavored to utilize their research to demonstrate the evidence for creation as understood in Scripture, with the ultimate goal of magnifying the Creator.